MORE THAN 100 BOOKS WERE SOLD IN THE FIRST MONTH OF RELEASE!
rns cover

We are very happy with the release of the Ruminant Nutrition System book. We hope you enjoy reading it as much as we enjoyed writing it!

Preface:
This book represents a lifetime achievement in itself; it is the product of many years of passion and dedication to enhancing livestock’s well-being and nutrition through research, teaching, and extension. The goals of this book on ruminant nutrition science are to document information, share knowledge, stimulate thinking and discussions, provoke criticism to build a better system, challenge the system with new discoveries, and foster learning by young students and teaching of scientists for the future. We hope this book will expose the virtual realms of modeling and simulation and engage applied ruminant nutritionists with a common purpose of further developing productive and reliable tools for practical applications. We expect our work to help students communicate with a common modeling language, resulting in the creation of mental models.

Audience:
This book is intended for teaching and research by faculty and graduate students at the master or doctoral levels in life sciences, animal science, wildlife and fisheries sciences, ecosystem science and management, veterinary medicine, and biology and zoology. This book will also be of use to practicing nutritionists who are seeking advanced information on applied ruminant nutrition (in cattle, sheep, and goats) and to understand biological and nutritional modeling of nutrient requirements by ruminants and nutrients supplied by feedstuffs undergoing ruminal fermentation, postruminal digestion, and absorption.

Software:
The purpose of the Ruminant Nutrition System software is to integrate and apply current scientific knowledge and to encourage creative and innovative ideas to solve practical feeding and nutrition problems. We are diligently working on the computer model that applies the knowledge presented in the book.

About the authors:

Dr. Luis Orlindo Tedeschi

Luis Tedeschi is a professor in the Department of Animal Science at the Texas A&M University. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Agronomy Engineering and his Master of Science degree in Animal and Forage Sciences from the University of São Paulo, and his Doctor of Philosophy degree in Animal Science from Cornell University. Prior to joining Texas A&M University in 2005, he held a research associate position at Cornell University. He teaches several courses related to ruminant animals for undergraduate and graduate students. His research focuses on the integration of accumulated scientific knowledge of ruminant nutrition to solve contemporary problems.

Texas A&M University Logo
Dr. Danny G. Fox

Danny Fox is a professor emeritus of the Department of Animal Science at Cornell University. He received his Bachelor of Science, Master of Science, and Doctor of Philosophy degrees from The Ohio State University. At Cornell University, Fox conducted research in cattle nutrition and taught courses in cattle nutrition and nutrient management. Before joining the faculty at Cornell, he held positions as a beef cattle extension feedlot specialist at South Dakota State University and Michigan State University. His 35 years of research at these three land grant universities focused on the development of data, methods, models, and computer programs to predict cattle nutrient requirements, as well as nutrients derived from feeds to meet cattle requirements in unique production situations.

Cornell University Logo

The Table of Contents is here. You may obtain a copy of the RNS book from Amazon.com or XanEdu.com

 

Brief Synopsis of Mathematical Nutrition Models

For approximately 55 years, computer models have been used as Decision Support Systems (DSS) to apply scientific knowledge to virtually every branch of science: from life sciences (e.g., development of the molecular structure of drugs and the management and planning for sustainable production of foods) to earth sciences (e.g., space exploration and global warming). Humankind has benefited tremendously by using DSS in specific areas for which experimentation is practically impossible or infeasible. Decision Support Systems (also referred to as Smart Decision Tools) can be broadly categorized into five classes: communication-driven, data-driven, document-driven, knowledge-driven, and model-driven (D. J. Powers). In the late 1960s, data-driven and model-driven DSS were built based on scientific knowledge, theory development, and operational research concepts. However, it was not until the advancement of microcomputers and software in the mid-1980s that DSS became user friendly and started being applied practically. The development of DSS was tightly connected to the evolution of the architecture and processing power of microcomputers.

Ruminant animals are widely utilized to convert human-inedible feedstuffs to nutritious food under widely varying conditions around the world. The goals of enhancing ruminant nutrition are to improve productivity, reduce resource use, and protect the environment. However, scientists often have to extrapolate nutrient requirements and feed values developed under standardized, controlled, laboratory research conditions to all combinations of cattle types, feeds, and environmental and management conditions. In these cases, DSS can be used as virtual simulators to predict nutritional requirements and feed utilization in a variety of production settings.

The Large Ruminant Nutrition System (LRNS) is a computer model that estimates beef and dairy cattle nutrient requirements and supply under specific conditions of animal type, environment (climatic factors), management, and physicochemical composition of available feeds. Accounting for farm-specific management, environmental, and dietary characteristics has enabled more accurate prediction of cattle growth, milk production, and nutrient excretion in diverse production situations have been possible. The LRNS uses the basic computational engine of the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) model, version 5, with additional modifications and implementations.

In collaboration with Cornell University and the University of Sassari in Italy, we developed the Small Ruminant Nutrition System (SRNS). The SRNS, based on the structure of the CNCPS for Sheep, is a computer model for predicting the nutrient requirements of sheep and feed biological values on farms. The SRNS predicts energy, protein, calcium and phosphorus requirements, accounting for animal factors (e.g., body weight, age, insulation, movement, milk production and composition, body reserves, mature weight, and pregnancy) and environmental factors (e.g., current and previous temperature, wind, and rainfall) factors. Feed biological values are predicted based on the pool size and fractional degradation and passage rates of carbohydrate and protein fractions, ruminal microbial growth, and physically effective fiber. The system predicts dry matter intake separately for different sheep categories based on equations developed for sheep fed indoors and on pasture. Based on this information, the SRNS predicts the energy balance of the animals. Energy balance is used to predict adult sheep’s body condition score, body weight variations, and, in lactating ewes, the amount of milk produced. For growing sheep, based on the energy balance and on the relative size of the lambs, the SRNS predicts average daily gain and the composition of the gain (fat, protein, water, and minerals). For feed biological values, the SRNS predicts ruminal pH based on dietary physically effective fiber, rumen nitrogen and peptide balances, the digestibility of each nutrient by the rumen and by the whole digestive tract, metabolizable protein from ruminal microbial protein and ruminally undegraded feed protein, and the energy cost of urea production and excretion. The system also predicts fecal and urinary excretions for each nutrient.

The Cattle Value Discovery System for growing cattle (CVDSgc) represents an evolution of a growth model first published by Fox and Black (1984) to account for differences in breed type and mature size when predicting performance and profitability of feedlot cattle with alternative management systems. Since then, modifications to the system, summarized by Tedeschi, et al. (2004), have improved its accuracy to account for more of the variation in nutrient requirements and performance of growing beef cattle. The CVDS was developed for use in individual cattle management for growing beef cattle, and it provides (1) prediction of daily gain, incremental cost of gain and days to finish to optimize profits and marketing decisions while marketing within the window of acceptable carcass weights and composition; (2) predictions of carcass composition during growth to avoid discounts for under or over-weight carcasses and excess backfat; and (3) allocation of feed fed to pens to individual animals for the purpose of sorting of individuals into pens by days to reach target body composition and maximum individual profitability. This allows mixed ownership of individuals in pens, determination of individual animal cost of gain for the purposes of billing feed and predicting incremental cost of gain, and provision of information that can be used to select for feed efficiency and profitability.

A more detailed discussion of the history of these and other mathematical nutrition models as well as their future applications can be found in this article.

 

Why Mathematical Nutrition Models?

Mathematical ruminant nutrition models can be used to integrate our knowledge of feed, intake, and digestion and passage rates upon feed energy values, escape of dietary protein, and microbial growth efficiency. They can be valuable tools for estimating animal requirements and nutrients derived from feeds in each unique farm production scenario, and thus can have an important role in providing information that can be used in the decision-making process to enhance the feeding system (Tedeschi et al., 2005b). By accounting for farm-specific animal, feed, and environmental characteristics, more accurate prediction of dietary nutrient requirements for maintenance, growth and milk production of cattle and nutrient excretion in diverse production situations is possible (Fox et al., 2004).

In the United States, livestock farms are under increasing pressure to reduce nutrient accumulation on the farm and manure nutrient excretions in order to meet environmental regulations (Fox et al., 2006). The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), an office of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), has identified the need to improve feed management in concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) to reduce manure nutrients. The USDA-NRCS has developed a national conservation practice standard for feed management (#592; USDA-NRCS, 2003) to be used as part of the nutrient management (#590; USDA-NRCS, 2006) planning process. The purpose of a feed management plan is (1) to supply the quantity of available nutrients required by livestock while reducing the quantity of nutrients excreted, and (2) to improve net farm income by feeding nutrients more efficiently.

The development of feeding and nutrient management plans is complex and requires the integration of a large amount of research and knowledge information. Therefore, mathematical nutrition models can be used to assist in the deployment of technology that meets governmental regulations by facilitating the application and development of site-specific plans. Furthermore, mechanistic models more accurately account for animal and crop requirements, and manure and soil management than fixed, tabular guidelines because they can be customized and calibrated for site-specific characteristics and recommendations (Tedeschi et al., 2005a; Tedeschi et al., 2005b).

The identification of cattle requirements and formulating diets to meet those requirements more accurately is the best current strategy to minimize nutrient output per kg of meat or milk produced. The terms precision feeding and phase feeding have been widely used to describe nutrient management practices that result in reduced excretion of nutrients by CAFO. Both terms refer to a more precise nutrition system, where nutritionists meet cattle nutritional needs without supplying nutrients in excess, reducing outputs and inputs. Phase feeding of protein or protein withdrawal is a systematic method that applies precision feeding concepts to different phases of animal growth to accurately meet their nutrient requirements during the feeding period. Phase feeding involves formulating and providing more specific rations during growth-specific periods as the animal matures (Vasconcelos et al., 2007).

Mathematical models of ruminant nutrition have been employed for over three decades (Chalupa and Boston 2003) and have stimulated improvements in feeding cattle. More complete data sets available in recent years combined with different mathematical approaches have allowed us to improve nutrition models. Several mathematical models of ruminant nutrition have been develop in the past (Tedeschi et al. 2005b) and it is likely that frequency of use will increase to support decision making not only in the nutrition of cattle, but also for other aspects including farm economics, animal management, and assessment of environmental impact (Tylutki et al. 2004).

The development and application of mathematical models are essential in several branches of the scientific research domain. Notably, predictive models are used to estimate the outcomes of experiments that cannot be practically (or ethically) conducted, directly measured, are cost prohibitive, or simply because there is plenty of available data and the collection of new data is neither justifiable nor acceptable. Even though, models are generally accepted by the scientific community, the identification of their adequacy for predictive purposes is extremely important in building confidence and acceptance of the predictions in broader situations.

The need to evaluate the correctness of model predictions has been widely discussed and several techniques have been proposed (Easterling and Berger, 2002; Hamilton, 1991; Tedeschi, 2006). Nonetheless, most evaluations are superficial and provide little or no information regarding the ability of a model in predicting future outcomes. This can be partially explained because most mathematical models are designed to be static, deterministic, and range-dependent, implying that there is a range of optimum predictive ability and often they have a narrower and site-specific application rather than a broader one. A second reason is related to the difficult in assessing the suitability of mathematical models due to the intrinsic unaccounted for variation of the database; thus, affecting the results of the evaluation process. A thorough and unbiased evaluation of a model is a requisite not only to build confidence in the model’s predictions, but also in designing more resilient models. Lastly, a third reason lies in using the evaluation process to prove the rightness and robustness of a mathematical model or even to promote its acceptance and usability by others (Sterman, 2002).

 

Press Releases and Newsletters

March 8, 2017. AgriLife Research projects evaluate feeder cattle on yeast-grain diet. AgriLife Today. By Blair Fannin.

January 11, 2017. Tedeschi earns Faculty Fellow during the Texas A&M AgriLife Conference. AgriLife Today. By Kathleen Phillips.

February 27, 2016. Tedeschi reciprocal technical-scientific visit to Southern Vietnam. Animal Science Newsletters.

October 22, 2014. Modeling Research Helping Reduce Emissions, Add Profit to Beef Production. Beef Magazine.

October 20, 2014. Nutrition modeling helps reduce cattle emissions (PDF). Feedsfuffs. by Tim Lundeen.

October 2, 2014. How the Beef Industry can Reduce Methane Emissions. AgWeb. By University News Release.

September 30, 2014. Modeling systems help feedlots keep feed costs in check. SouthWest Farm Press. By Blair Fannin.

September 28, 2014. The utility of applied nutrition models: A Brief history and future perspectives. Department of Animal Science.

September 23, 2014. Applied nutrition modeling producing beef more profitably, helping reduce methane emissions in feedlots. AgriLife Today. By Blair Fannin.

April 3, 2013. Body condition score modeling system part of broodmare equine research. AgriLife Today. By Blair Fannin.

 

Other Links

The Utility of Applied Nutrition Models: A Brief History and Future Perspectives

National Animal Nutrition Program (NANP) - National Research Support Project (NRSP-9)

System Dynamics Society

Big Data, System Dynamics and XMILE

A comprehensive list of modeling environments is available here, includingAnyLogic, ExtendSim, Mathematica and System Modeler, MATLAB, NetLogo, PowerSim, Stella and iThink, Vensim and Ventity, and VisSim.

 

Graphical network

 

 
Custom Search